The proposed Renters’ Rights Bill represents a significant shift in tenant protections—most notably, the long-anticipated abolition of Section 21 “no-fault” evictions. But within the draft legislation, one clause is raising concern: Section 6B.
Section 6B provides a legal route for landlords to regain possession of a property in order to carry out major refurbishment works. In principle, this makes sense—rental homes need to be maintained. But in practice, the clause may be too vague, creating a potential back door for eviction without proper cause.
“Section 6B could be a sensible reform – if it’s handled properly. But without clear definitions and proper oversight, it runs the risk of being misused, disputed or even ignored.”
– Sián Hemming-Metcalfe, Operations Director at Inventory Base (Property118)
Why This Matters
This isn’t just a legal nuance—it’s a risk multiplier for everyone involved in the rental process.
- Tenants could face unjust evictions under the guise of property upgrades—undermining the very protection the bill aims to provide.
- Landlords may see this as a practical option to reclaim properties, but any misuse could result in legal exposure or reputational damage.
- Letting agents and property managers could face a wave of new disputes and adjudication challenges, increasing both workload and liability.
What Needs to Be Addressed
To ensure this provision isn’t misapplied, three key changes should be considered:
- Clear Definition of “Major Works”
Provide a working definition that outlines what qualifies, including types of projects, budget thresholds, and supporting evidence. - Oversight and Documentation
Require landlords to submit proof of intent—like planning permission, contractor quotes, or project timelines—before serving notice under Section 6B. - Consequences for Misuse
Introduce penalties or restrictions for landlords who invoke Section 6B but fail to follow through on the promised renovations.
Looking Ahead
The Renters’ Rights Bill has the potential to rebalance the rental landscape in favour of fairness and transparency. But small loopholes can have large impacts. Clarifying Section 6B is an opportunity to uphold the spirit of the reform—without creating unintended opportunities for misuse.
For more context, you can read the original report on Property118.